From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Terhune

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 23, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1820 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-1820 LKK KJM P.

August 23, 2006


ORDER


On December 8, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued an order finding service appropriate for some, but not all, of the defendants listed in plaintiff's amended complaint. On May 19, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 72-303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within ten court days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties." E.D. Local Rule 72-303(b). Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of December 8, 2005 is therefore untimely.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 19, 2006 request for reconsideration is denied.


Summaries of

Jordan v. Terhune

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 23, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1820 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Jordan v. Terhune

Case Details

Full title:JOHN R. JORDAN, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAL A. TERHUNE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 23, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-1820 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2006)