From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 18, 1969
220 So. 2d 875 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)

Opinion

7 Div. 935.

January 14, 1969. Rehearing Denied February 18, 1969.

Appeal from the County Court of Cherokee County, B. Guy Smith, J.

Burns, Carr Shumaker, Centre, for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Marlin Mooneyham, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


This is an appeal from a judgment revoking Appellant's probation.

Submission was on the merits and on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from because assignment of errors was not written or typed upon transcript paper and bound with the transcript as required by Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Title 7 Appendix.

We have held that assignments of error are essential to present questions for our reveiw on appeal from revocation. Sparks v. State, 40 Ala. App. 551, 119 So.2d 596; Fiorella v. State, 40 Ala. App. 587, 121 So.2d 875; Hemphill v. State, 41 Ala. App. 441, 134 So.2d 432.

The assignments of error are on two pages of transcript paper, stapled together and placed in the transcript. They are not attached to the record. This is not a compliance with Supreme Court Rule 1, therefore, there is nothing before us to be considered. Fuller v. Porter, 274 Ala. 321, 148 So.2d 648.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Jordan v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 18, 1969
220 So. 2d 875 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)
Case details for

Jordan v. State

Case Details

Full title:Troy JORDAN v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 18, 1969

Citations

220 So. 2d 875 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)
220 So. 2d 875

Citing Cases

Jordan v. State

MERRILL, Justice. Petition of Troy Jordan for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the…

Bates v. State

However, we have held that assignments of error are absolutely essential to present questions for our review…