From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 10, 1931
295 P. 229 (Okla. Crim. App. 1931)

Opinion

No. A-7730.

Opinion Filed January 10, 1931.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Affirmance in Absence of Brief or Oral Argument. Where no briefs are filed in support of an appeal, and no appearance for oral argument made, and examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error, the case will be affirmed.

Appeal from County Court, Garfield County; A.A. Stull, Judge.

Jackson Jordan was convicted of having possession of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

L.C. McLean, for plaintiff in error.

J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Garfield county of having possession of intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The case was tried in November, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in February, 1930. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

Where an appeal is brought to this court upon conviction for a misdemeanor, and no briefs are filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance for oral argument made when the case was set for submission, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and if none appear, and the evidence supports the judgment, it will be affirmed. No material error is apparent in this case.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jordan v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 10, 1931
295 P. 229 (Okla. Crim. App. 1931)
Case details for

Jordan v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACKSON JORDAN v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 10, 1931

Citations

295 P. 229 (Okla. Crim. App. 1931)
295 P. 229