Jordan v. State

8 Citing cases

  1. Warren v. State

    25 So. 2d 695 (Ala. Crim. App. 1946)   Cited 8 times

    Code, Tit. 15, §§ 207, 328, 333. Objections to alleged improper argument of solicitor must be specific. Jordan v. State, ante, p. 172, 24 So.2d 138; Armour Co. v. Cartledge, 234 Ala. 644, 176 So. 334. CARR, Judge.

  2. Jordan v. State

    24 So. 2d 140 (Ala. 1945)   Cited 2 times

    SIMPSON, Justice. Petition of Andrew Jordan for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Jordan v. State, 24 So.2d 138. Writ denied.

  3. Henry v. State

    355 So. 2d 411 (Ala. Crim. App. 1978)   Cited 20 times
    In Henry, the court observed that because the accused is not required to notify the prosecution of an alibi defense, the prosecution generally does not know of the existence of an alibi until it is revealed from the witness stand.

    A party cannot justly complain of the action of the trial court in overruling an objection to argument based solely on an invalid ground. Harris v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 333 So.2d 894 (1976); Jordan v. State, 32 Ala. App. 172, 24 So.2d 138, cert. denied, 247 Ala. 304, 24 So.2d 140 (1946). We have carefully reviewed the record and finding no error are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court is due to be affirmed.

  4. McCord v. State

    344 So. 2d 207 (Ala. Crim. App. 1977)   Cited 1 times

    Such objection to improper argument of solicitor must be specific. Jordan v. State, 32 Ala. App. 172, 24 So.2d 138 (5). Remarks deemed objectionable should be fully quoted, or substantially so, in an objection to argument. Title 13, Section 262; McClary v. State, 291 Ala. 481, 282 So.2d 384 (2).

  5. Alday v. State

    151 So. 2d 220 (Ala. Crim. App. 1963)   Cited 9 times

    We cannot, from this meager excerpt, arbitrate the proper innuendo. Jordan v. State, 32 Ala. App. 172, 24 So.2d 138. The tenth proposition arose thus:

  6. McGraw v. State

    36 So. 2d 559 (Ala. Crim. App. 1948)   Cited 10 times

    There is therefore no basis on which to rationally review the ruling on the objection to which an exception was reserved. Warren v. State, 32 Ala. App. 302, 25 So.2d 695; Jordan v. State, 32 Ala. App. 172, 24 So.2d 138. The record being free of error substantially affecting the material rights of this appellant this cause is ordered affirmed.

  7. Adams v. State

    29 So. 2d 148 (Ala. Crim. App. 1947)   Cited 7 times

    Knott v. State, 19 Ala. App. 258, 96 So. 731; Mills v. State, 21 Ala. App. 46, 104 So. 889; Hawkins v. State, 29 Ala. App. 221, 195 So. 762. Relevancy and competency of evidence is for the trial court. Whetstone v. State, 19 Ala. App. 331, 98 So. 216; Ward v. State, 4 Ala. App. 112, 58 So. 788. As to argument to the solicitor, there is nothing on which to base a decision, the particular objectionable matter not being properly identified or pointed out. Sullivan v. State, 23 Ala. App. 210, 119 So. 243; Jordan v. State, Ante, p. 172, 24 So.2d 138; Id., Ala.Sup., 24 So.2d 140; Mayo v. State, Ante, p. 264, 24 So.2d 769; Naugher v. State, 241 Ala. 91, 1 So.2d 294; Anderson v. State, 209 Ala. 36, 95 So. 171. To constitute reversible error the statement of the solicitor must have been made as a fact and the fact so stated be unsupported by the evidence.

  8. Mayo v. State

    24 So. 2d 769 (Ala. Crim. App. 1946)   Cited 9 times

    An objection not addressed to the specific remarks of the argument was properly overruled. Jordan v. State, ante, p. 172, 24 So.2d 138. We are of the opinion that the argument of the solicitor did not come within the inhibited scope of legitimate discussion, or transcend the legitimate boundary of such discussion.