From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 14, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00185-REB-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 14, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-cv-00185-REB-MJW

11-14-2014

AARON IVAN JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER SLOAN, Aurora P.O., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the magistrate judge's Report & Recommendation on Defendant's Motion To Dismiss for Failure To Prosecute (Docket No. 31) and Order To Show Cause (Docket No. 34) [#36], filed October 14, 2014. No objection having been filed to the recommendation, I review it for plain error only. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).

"[#36]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122. In addition, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed his pleadings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10thCir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)).
--------

I perceive no error, much less plain error, in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition of this matter. The magistrate judge's thorough recitation of the procedural history of this case, as well as the history of plaintiff's other aborted or abandoned litigation efforts in this district, leads me to concur with the conclusion that a dismissal with prejudice is appropriate under the factors enumerated in Ehrenhaus v. Reynolds, 965 F.2d 916, 920 (10th Cir. 1992). I therefore find and conclude that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be approved and adopted.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the magistrate judge's Report & Recommendation on Defendant's Motion To Dismiss for Failure To Prosecute (Docket No. 31) and Order To Show Cause (Docket No. 34) [#36], filed October 14, 2014, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That the Order To Show Cause [#34], filed September 25, 2014, is MADE ABSOLUTE;

3. That plaintiff's claims in this lawsuit are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute;

4. That judgment with prejudice SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant, Christopher Sloan, Aurora P.O., against plaintiff, Aaron Ivan Jordan, on all claims for relief and causes of action asserted against the defendant in this action; and

5. That defendant is AWARDED his costs, to be taxed by the clerk of the court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

Dated November 14, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jordan v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 14, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00185-REB-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Jordan v. Sloan

Case Details

Full title:AARON IVAN JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER SLOAN, Aurora P.O., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 14, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-cv-00185-REB-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 14, 2014)