Opinion
(Filed 27 October, 1920.)
Negligence — Instructions.
APPEAL from Guion, J., at April Term, 1920, of NEW HANOVER. The following issues were submitted:
"1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: `No.'
"2. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover?"
From judgment rendered plaintiff appealed.
Wright Stevens and W. P. Stacy for plaintiff.
Rountree Davis for defendant.
There are 41 assignments of error in the record. Five of them relate to the evidence. The remaining assignments are directed to the charge of the judge. It is impossible to consider all of the assignments in an opinion of reasonable length. We have carefully examined them, and can find no substantial error. The charge of the judge is full and clear, and based upon the principles of law as laid down in Bagwell v. R. R., 167 N.C. 611, and Crampton v. Ivie, 126 N.C. 894.
No error.