From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Murin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 23, 2019
Case No. 1:18-cv-228-SPB-RAL (W.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cv-228-SPB-RAL

08-23-2019

DAVID JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT MURIN, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This prisoner civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 16, 2018 and referred to the undersigned, then a United States Magistrate Judge, for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges. Six days later, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directed that his complaint be filed. ECF No. 2. In September 2018, the undersigned was sworn in as a United States District Judge, and this matter was transferred to United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo for all pretrial proceedings. ECF No. 9.

On December 28, 2018, a motion to dismiss was filed by Dr. Alpert, Dr. Eslenberg, and Heather McKeel (the "Medical Defendants"). See ECF No. 38. On January 14, 2019, a motion to dismiss was filed by Defendants Murin, Kosarek, Lutz, LaRoche, Cochran, Palmer, Jordan, Drayer, Baumcratz and Griffin (the "DOC Defendants"). See ECF No. 44.

On July 23, 2019, the undersigned became the presiding United States District Judge in this matter. Two days later, on July 25, 2019, Magistrate Judge Lanzillo issued a report and recommendation, opining that the Medical Defendants' motion to dismiss should be denied and that the DOC Defendants' motion to dismiss should be granted as to Defendant Palmer only, and otherwise denied. Magistrate Judge Lanzillo further recommended that the claims against Defendant Palmer be dismissed with prejudice, on the grounds that they are time-barred. ECF No. 60.

Objections to the report and recommendation were due on or before August 12, 2019. To date, no objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2019;

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Dr. Alpert, Dr. Eslenberg, and Heather McKeel, ECF No. [38], shall be, and hereby is, DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Murin, Kosarek, Lutz, LaRoche, Cochran, Palmer, Jordan, Drayer, Baumcratz and Griffin, ECF No. [44], shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED as to Defendant Palmer only, and the claims against Defendant Palmer are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. In all other respects, said motion is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the report and recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Lanzillo on July 25, 2019, ECF No. [60], is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court.

/s/_________

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jordan v. Murin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 23, 2019
Case No. 1:18-cv-228-SPB-RAL (W.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Jordan v. Murin

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT MURIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 23, 2019

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cv-228-SPB-RAL (W.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2019)

Citing Cases

Talbert v. Dep't of Corr.

. Jordan v. Murin, No. 18-00228, 2019 WL 3997897, at *3 (W.D. Pa. July 25, 2019), report and recommendation…