From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Magill

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2019
No. 18-7438 (4th Cir. Apr. 22, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7438

04-22-2019

CHARLES JORDAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN H. MAGILL; JAMES G. BOGLE; JUDGE PAUL M. BURCH, Defendants - Appellees.

Charles Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge. (5:18-cv-02852-DCN) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Jordan appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012) review, Jordan's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jordan's informal brief and supplement thereto do not dispute the bases for the district court's dismissal, Jordan has forfeited appellate review of the district court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny Jordan's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Jordan v. Magill

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2019
No. 18-7438 (4th Cir. Apr. 22, 2019)
Case details for

Jordan v. Magill

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JORDAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN H. MAGILL; JAMES G. BOGLE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 22, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7438 (4th Cir. Apr. 22, 2019)