From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. DiRae

The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One
May 28, 1953
257 P.2d 773 (Wash. 1953)

Opinion

No. 32301.

May 28, 1953.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Benton county, No. 11525, Hamilton, J., entered May 29, 1952, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action on contract, tried to the court. Affirmed.

Heideman, Flanagan Duncan, for appellant.

Hugh B. Horton, for respondents.



The statement of facts in this case has heretofore been stricken ( Jordan v. DiRae, 41 Wn.2d 570, 250 P.2d 523); and the only question presented is: Do the findings of fact support the judgment?

The appeal is from an order of the superior court dismissing an action for the amount due under a conditional sales contract whereby the plaintiff, appellant here, sold to the defendants, respondents here, certain corporate stock and other property.

The trial court found that the corporation was engaged in the operation of a club where "there was gambling at least by slot machines and card games"; and

"That plaintiff [appellant] at all times had knowledge of the illegal nature of the use of the club and its illegal purposes and participated in such use and purpose."

On such findings, the court upheld the affirmative defense that the transaction was illegal and against public policy, and dismissed the action.

The findings of fact obviously support the judgment. It should have been apparent that, with the statement of facts stricken, the further prosecution of the appeal was futile. The judgment of dismissal is affirmed.


Summaries of

Jordan v. DiRae

The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One
May 28, 1953
257 P.2d 773 (Wash. 1953)
Case details for

Jordan v. DiRae

Case Details

Full title:LYLE S. JORDAN, Appellant, v. INA DiRAE et al., Respondents

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One

Date published: May 28, 1953

Citations

257 P.2d 773 (Wash. 1953)
42 Wash. 2d 934
42 Wn. 2d 934

Citing Cases

Sweeney v. Sweeney

Rule on Appeal 32, 34A Wn.2d 32, as amended, effective March 1, 1954. A statement of facts is not necessary…

Kane v. Smith

[1] On remand, the trial court adhered to its original certification; and this court, after again hearing…