From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. City of Detroit

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 12, 2011
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-10153-RHC-VMM (E.D. Mich. Dec. 12, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-10153-RHC-VMM

12-12-2011

JASMINE GUY JORDAN Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT, WAYNE COUNTY, DETROIT POLICE OFFICERS MOEK, WYCHE , SGT MICHAEL MARTEL AND INSPECTOR WILLIAMS, JOHN DOE I and JOHN DOE II in their individual capacities, Jointly and severally, Defendants.

D. RICK MARTIN Attorney for Plaintiff RONALD D. GLOTTA Glotta and Associates P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff KARIE H. BOYLAN Attorney for Defendant Wayne County JERRY L. ASHFORD Attorney for Defendant City


Hon. Robert H. Cleland

Magistrate Judge Virginia Morgan

D. RICK MARTIN

Attorney for Plaintiff

RONALD D. GLOTTA

Glotta and Associates P.C.

Attorney for Plaintiff

KARIE H. BOYLAN

Attorney for Defendant Wayne County

JERRY L. ASHFORD

Attorney for Defendant City

STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

At a session of said U.S. District Court

held in the City of Detroit,

County of Wayne, State of Michigan


PRESENT: Hon.ROBERT H. CLELAND

U.S. District Court Judge

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the affixed stipulation and consent of the Plaintiff and Defendant, Wayne County, by and through their respective counsel, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, Wayne County shall produce the following within ten days from entry of this Order:

(1) Wayne County shall provide the "subjects of that information" as mandated by Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(i) for the following individuals listed by Wayne County as "Witnesses" in its Fourth Supplemental/Amend Rule 26 Disclosures: Tom Dawson, Mary Sue Czarnecki, Rob Moran, and Nettie Wright;
(2) For any information, communication or document requested by Plaintiff for which Wayne County claims is privileged, Wayne County shall produce to Plaintiff a Privilege Log that "describes the nature of the documents, communications, or tangible things not produced or disclosed—and to so in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the claim" as mandated by Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(i);
(3) Wayne County shall provide Plaintiff with (a) any and all policies regarding the Jail's Monitoring of Telephone Communications during the period of Plaintiff's incarceration, (b) any and all recordings of Plaintiff's telephone calls while in its Jail; and (c) identify the individual(s) responsible for
enforcing the policy regarding the monitoring of detainees' telephone calls.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Robert H. Cleland

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVE AS TO FORM:

________________

D. Rick Martin (P42484)

Attorney for Plaintiff

________________

Karie H. Boylan (P55468)

Attorney for Wayne County

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, D. Rick Martin, hereby certify that on the 9th day of December, 2011, I electronically mailed the foregoing paper to Karie H. Boylan and Jerry L. Ashford.

________________

D. Rick Martin (P42484)

Attorney for Plaintiff

220 Bagley, Suite 808

Detroit, MI 48226

313-963-1320

drickmartin@glottaassociates.com


Summaries of

Jordan v. City of Detroit

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 12, 2011
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-10153-RHC-VMM (E.D. Mich. Dec. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Jordan v. City of Detroit

Case Details

Full title:JASMINE GUY JORDAN Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT, WAYNE COUNTY, DETROIT…

Court:UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 12, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-10153-RHC-VMM (E.D. Mich. Dec. 12, 2011)