Opinion
Civil Action 2:23-CV-00017
08-02-2023
JEROME JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. BROWN, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On June 30, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute” (M&R, D.E. 29). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's M&R. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's M&R (D.E. 29), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b).
ORDERED.~