From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Asuncion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2021
Case No. CV 17-1283 PSG (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-1283 PSG (PVC)

03-12-2021

PAUL JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. DEBBIE ASUNCION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment ("MSJ"), all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Plaintiff's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

In his Objections, Plaintiff renews his contention that he did not receive all the discovery he was due and asks this Court to reject the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on that basis and reopen discovery "so a jury can hear the case." (Obj. at 2). These Objections are unavailing. The Court has previously considered Plaintiff's discovery arguments, most recently in addressing Plaintiff's Second Motion for Default and Request for Reconsideration. The Court construed these motions as a motion to compel and required a response from Defendants. (See Dkt. No. 46 (Order construing Plaintiff's Second Motion for Default and Request for Reconsideration as a motion to compel); Dkt. No. 50 (declaration of Defendants' counsel, attaching complete copies of all of Defendants' responses to Plaintiff's discovery requests); Dkt. No. 54 (Order denying Plaintiff's motions). Plaintiff's unsupported assertions that additional discovery must exist are not persuasive and insufficient to create a triable issue of material fact on summary judgment.

IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment shall be entered DISMISSING this action WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff at his address of record and on counsel for Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 3/12/21

/s/_________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jordan v. Asuncion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2021
Case No. CV 17-1283 PSG (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Jordan v. Asuncion

Case Details

Full title:PAUL JORDAN, Plaintiff, v. DEBBIE ASUNCION, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2021

Citations

Case No. CV 17-1283 PSG (PVC) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2021)