From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Wyrick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2017
No. 2:17-cv-00165 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-00165 CKD P

08-30-2017

WYDELL JONES, Plaintiff, v. T. WYRICK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Recent court orders were served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: August 30, 2017

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
jone0165.33a


Summaries of

Jones v. Wyrick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2017
No. 2:17-cv-00165 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Jones v. Wyrick

Case Details

Full title:WYDELL JONES, Plaintiff, v. T. WYRICK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2017

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-00165 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2017)