Jones v. Williams

Full title: CLARENCE EUGENE JONES, Plaintiff, v. MAX WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon, Eugene Division

Date published: Apr 15, 2010

Civil No. 09-29-TC (D. Or. Apr. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-29-TC.

April 15, 2010

ORDER

THOMAS COFFIN, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (#45) is denied as moot as it is superseded by plaintiff's Motion (#91).

Plaintiff's Motions to Compel (#65), (#66), (#67), and (#68) are denied without prejudice pursuant to the court's Order (#84) staying discovery.

Plaintiff's Motion for Modification of Pre-trial order (#86) is allowed.

Plaintiff's Motion for extension of time (#90) is allowed.

Plaintiff's motion to Amend/Correct partial summary judgment (#91) is allowed.

Plaintiff's Motion to make declaration of Keith Davis More definite and certain (#92) is denied.

Plaintiff's Motion for extension of time to file motion for reconsideration (#93) is denied.

Plaintiff's Motion for Stay of Motion for Summary Judgment (#94) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED