From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 25, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-3000 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-3000 KJN P

07-25-2012

CHARLES JONES, JR., Plaintiff, v. TIM VIRGA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By an order filed May 22, 2012, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants, or to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 7.) That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

_________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 25, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-3000 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Jones v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JONES, JR., Plaintiff, v. TIM VIRGA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 25, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-3000 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2012)