Opinion
No. 09-55451.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed October 7, 2010.
William J. Jones, Delano, CA, pro se.
Peter G. Bertling, Esquire, Steve H. Shlens, Bertling Clausen, Santa Barbara, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:03-cv-06151-DDPAJW.
Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
We do not consider the district court's disposition of William J. Jones's claims because he identifies no error that he contends the district court committed and presents no argument challenging any of its rulings. See Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues raised in pro se litigant's brief but not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).