From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Velocity Tech. Sols.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 21, 2021
2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP (PS)

07-21-2021

GARRISON JONES, Plaintiff, v. VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL

ECF NO. 42

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff moves to compel defendant “to produce documents identified as they claim in the complaint from Northern Illinois and indicate the document and line number where the FMLA allegation and claim exist.” ECF No. 42 at 1-2. Plaintiff has not indicated that he has met and conferred with defendant's counsel before filing this motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1). Further, plaintiff does not indicate that he served any discovery requests that have gone unanswered. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(3). Thus, plaintiffs motion to compel, ECF No. 42, is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Velocity Tech. Sols.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 21, 2021
2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Velocity Tech. Sols.

Case Details

Full title:GARRISON JONES, Plaintiff, v. VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)