From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Valdez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 11, 2016
No. 3:15-CV-3966-M (N.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2016)

Opinion

No. 3:15-CV-3966-M

01-11-2016

KELVIN JONES, Petitioner, v. LUPE VALDEZ, Respondent


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its finding that Movant has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court's "assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong," or (2) that reasonable jurists would find "it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right" and "debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

In the event Petitioner will file a notice of appeal, the Court notes that he must pay the filing fee ($505.00) or file a motion for leave proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

SO ORDERED this 11 day of January, 2016.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Jones v. Valdez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 11, 2016
No. 3:15-CV-3966-M (N.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Jones v. Valdez

Case Details

Full title:KELVIN JONES, Petitioner, v. LUPE VALDEZ, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 11, 2016

Citations

No. 3:15-CV-3966-M (N.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2016)