From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Vadlamudi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 14, 2015
Civ. No. 9:13-CV-00025 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Civ. No. 9:13-CV-00025

02-14-2015

JOHN JONES, Plaintiff, v. DR. VADLAMUDI, et al., Defendants.


THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge

DECISION & ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to the Report-Recommendation and Order dated January 20, 2015 have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

II. DISCUSSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 65) for the reasons stated therein. Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 55) is GRANTED, and all claims in this action are DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court may enter judgment for the Defendants and mark this case as closed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 14, 2015 /s/_________
Thomas J. McAvoy
Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Jones v. Vadlamudi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 14, 2015
Civ. No. 9:13-CV-00025 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Jones v. Vadlamudi

Case Details

Full title:JOHN JONES, Plaintiff, v. DR. VADLAMUDI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 14, 2015

Citations

Civ. No. 9:13-CV-00025 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2015)