From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Unitrin Auto & Home Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 25, 2013
65 A.3d 912 (Pa. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-25

Lee JONES, Respondent v. UNITRIN AUTO AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 234 WAL 2012.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 40 A.3d 125.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Joint Application Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123 for Limited Remand for Purposes of Settlement Approval, treated as an Application for Relief, is GRANTED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County for purposes of presenting a proposed settlement to that court for approval. Should settlement efforts prove unsuccessful, Petitioner may seek reinstatement of its Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 90 days of this Order.

Jurisdiction relinquished.


Summaries of

Jones v. Unitrin Auto & Home Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 25, 2013
65 A.3d 912 (Pa. 2013)
Case details for

Jones v. Unitrin Auto & Home Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Lee JONES, Respondent v. UNITRIN AUTO AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

65 A.3d 912 (Pa. 2013)