From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. United States

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 18, 2022
20-cv-08710-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2022)

Opinion

20-cv-08710-WHO (PR)

08-18-2022

BRETT “EEON” JONES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Respondents.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner Jones has not filed an amended petition by the deadline of July 18, 2022. Accordingly, this federal habeas corpus action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to file an amended petition and for failing to prosecute this action, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Jones may move to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page, and it must contain an amended petition on this Court's form that complies with the instructions dismissing the prior petition with leave to amend.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of respondents, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. United States

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 18, 2022
20-cv-08710-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Jones v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BRETT “EEON” JONES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 18, 2022

Citations

20-cv-08710-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2022)