Jones v. Unipres U.S.A., Inc.

Full title: FREDDIE G. JONES, Plaintiff, v. UNIPRES U.S.A., INC., Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-01089 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-01089

01-08-2013

FREDDIE G. JONES, Plaintiff, v. UNIPRES U.S.A., INC., Defendant.

M. Clark Spoden James B. Johnson STITES & HARBISON, PLLC Attorneys for Defendant Unipres U.S.A., Inc.

TRAUGER

JUDGE TRAUGER

MAGISTRATE JUDGE BRYANT

JURY DEMAND

MOTION OF DEFENDANT UNIPRES, U.S.A., INC., FOR PERMISSION TO FILE

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Defendant Unipres U.S.A., Inc., ("Unipres") respectfully requests permission to file its supplemental memorandum (Docket No. 19) regarding its Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5) today, instead of January 4, 2013, as provided in this Court's Order of December 20, 2012, (Docket No. 17). Counsel for Unipres simply requests the Court's grace for the one business day extension of time. Moreover, since Defendant's Supplemental Memorandum concludes that Plaintiff's amended pleading relates back to the date the original complaint was filed under its reading of relevant authority, the one-business-day delay in filing is not material. Further, Plaintiff is not prejudiced by this one-business-day extension.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________

M. Clark Spoden

James B. Johnson

STITES & HARBISON, PLLC

Attorneys for Defendant Unipres U.S.A., Inc.