Jones v. Toft

Full title: ANTHONY JONES, Plaintiff, v. TOFT, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 27, 2011

CIV S-11-0192 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2011)

Opinion

ANTHONY JONES, Plaintiff, v. TOFT, et al., Defendants. No. CIV S-11-0192 MCE EFB P United States District Court, E.D. California. May 27, 2011

          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND Jr., District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On April 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed April 15, 2011 (ECF No. 17), are ADOPTED in full; and

         2. Plaintiff's equal protection claims against defendants Toft and Blum are DISMISSED without prejudice.