From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 13, 1907
100 S.W. 150 (Tex. Crim. App. 1907)

Opinion

No. 3713.

Decided February 13, 1907.

Local Option — Motion for new Trial — Reinstating Judgment.

Upon motion for new trial in a conviction for a violation of the local option law, which motion was granted, it was reversible error to reinstate the judgment of conviction.

Appeal from the County Court of Young. Tried below before the Hon. Jo. W. Aiken.

Appeal from a conviction for violation of the local option law; penalty, a fine of $25 and twenty days confinement in the county jail.

The opinion states the case.

C.W. Johnson and John C. Key, for appellant.

F.J. McCord, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.


After conviction the court granted appellant's motion for new trial, and set aside the judgment, awarding such new trial. Subsequently, the court set aside his judgment awarding a new trial, and sought to reinstate the judgment of conviction. Upon this error is assigned. Appellant's contention is well taken. After a motion for new trial has been awarded appellant, the case stands as it originally stood, that is, for trial. This question was discussed in Mathis v. State, 40 Tex.Crim. Rep.. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Jones v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 13, 1907
100 S.W. 150 (Tex. Crim. App. 1907)
Case details for

Jones v. the State

Case Details

Full title:H.M. JONES v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 13, 1907

Citations

100 S.W. 150 (Tex. Crim. App. 1907)
51 Tex. Crim. 3

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson

(See United States v. Spinella (5th Cir. 1975), 506 F.2d 426; Hefton v. State (1934), 206 Ind. 663, 190 N.E.…

Moore v. State

Id. In two later cases, Jones v. State, 51 Tex.Crim. 3, 100 S.W. 150 (1907) and Ex parte Alexander, 129…