Summary
vacating and remanding "[i]n order to permit the district court first consideration of Jones's petition in light of the Court's holding in Holland"
Summary of this case from Henderson v. ThalerOpinion
No. 09-70019.
June 17, 2010.
Lydia M. Brandt, The Brandt Law Firm, Richardson, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Jeremy Craig Greenwell, Office of the Attorney General, Law Enforcement Defense Div., Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 4:05-CV-638.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
This appeal concerns the application of equitable tolling under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. Jones contends that his failure to timely file a federal habeas petition should be excused as his attorney's conduct was so deficient as to amount to an extraordinary circumstance warranting tolling. The district court dismissed his petition, finding that under this court's jurisprudence, Jones was not entitled to tolling and that therefore his petition was time-barred. The Supreme Court recently spoke to the issues raised in this case in its opinion in Holland v. Florida. In order to permit the district court first consideration of Jones's petition in light of the Court's holding in Holland, we VACATE and REMAND.
Holland v. Florida, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 2549, 177 L.Ed.2d 130 (2010).