Jones v. Swingle

Full title: MALIK JONES, Plaintiff, v. D. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 31, 2011

No. CIV S-09-0619 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0619 GEB EFB P.

January 31, 2011

ORDER

GARLAND BURRELL JR., District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 28, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the date the findings and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 28, 2010, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant Reglie is dismissed without prejudice.

So ordered.

Dated: January 31, 2011