From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Superior Court of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 5, 2021
No. 2:20-cv-1102 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2021)

Opinion

No. 2:20-cv-1102 TLN AC P

02-05-2021

ROBERT CHARLES JONES, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed December 28, 2020, plaintiff, a county prisoner, was ordered to file a certified copy of his prison trust account statement and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 6. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed his trust account statement or otherwise responded to the order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: February 5, 2021

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Superior Court of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 5, 2021
No. 2:20-cv-1102 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Superior Court of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CHARLES JONES, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 5, 2021

Citations

No. 2:20-cv-1102 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2021)