Opinion
No. ED 102497
10-06-2015
Arthur Jones, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Amy Faerber, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 889, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
Amy Faerber, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 889, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Arthur Jones appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Jones raises two points on appeal: 1) that trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to object to the hammer instruction (MAI–CR 3d 312.10) given to the jury; and 2) that trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to obtain and introduce into evidence a bloodstained shirt. We affirm.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).