From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 12, 2016
190 So. 3d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D14–4129.

04-12-2016

Rashane JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richard M. Bracey, III, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richard M. Bracey, III, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant's conviction without comment, but we reverse his sentence and remand for resentencing because, although the trial court correctly determined based on then-controlling appellate decisions that it was required to impose consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the 10–20–Life statute, the Florida Supreme Court subsequently quashed one of those decisions and held that consecutive sentencing is permissible but not mandatory. See Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla.2016) (“If ... multiple firearm offenses are committed contemporaneously, during which time multiple victims are shot at, then consecutive sentencing is permissible but not mandatory. In other words, a trial judge has discretion to order the mandatory minimum sentences to run consecutively, but may impose the sentences concurrently.”) (citations omitted).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

WETHERELL, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 12, 2016
190 So. 3d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:RASHANE JONES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 12, 2016

Citations

190 So. 3d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)