From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 17, 1978
243 S.E.2d 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

55205.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 30, 1978.

DECIDED MARCH 17, 1978.

Attempt to commit armed robbery. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge McKenzie.

Cohen, Mackin Pollock, Dennis S. Mackin, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Dean R. Davis, Thomas W. Thrash, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.


Attempt to commit armed robbery. At a bench trial, the evidence showed that appellant, Jones, entered a lounge at a late hour carrying a sawed-off shotgun concealed beneath his coat. Thereafter, Jones pointed the weapon at a security guard, who shot him. Jones fled. From an adverse verdict, Jones appeals on the general grounds, contending that the evidence failed to show an intent to commit armed robbery. Held:

"A person will not be presumed to act with criminal intention, but the trier of facts may find such intention upon consideration of the words, conduct, demeanor, motive, and all other circumstances connected with the act for which the accused is prosecuted." (Emphasis supplied.) Code Ann. § 26-505. See Bloodworth v. State, 129 Ga. App. 40, 41 (2) ( 198 S.E.2d 341). "As to the general grounds, this court is bound by the `any evidence' rule and must accept the state's version of the evidence, as was done by ... the trial judge." Franklin v. State, 136 Ga. App. 47, 48 (1) ( 220 S.E.2d 60). There was sufficient evidence from which the trier of fact could infer an intent to commit armed robbery.

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Shulman, J., concur.


SUBMITTED JANUARY 30, 1978 — DECIDED MARCH 17, 1978.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 17, 1978
243 S.E.2d 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:JONES v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 17, 1978

Citations

243 S.E.2d 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
243 S.E.2d 747

Citing Cases

Green v. State

' [Cit.] There was sufficient evidence from which the trier of fact could infer an intent to [sell or…