From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 2, 2003
113 S.W.3d 685 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 82168

September 2, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable James R. Hartenbach.

Ruth B. Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck Burgess, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Clifford H. Ahrens, P.J., William H. Crandall, Jr., J. Lawrence E. Mooney, J.



ORDER


Movant, Chad W. Jones, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends the motion court clearly erred in finding his claim for jail time credit was not cognizable.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 2, 2003
113 S.W.3d 685 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHAD W. JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Sep 2, 2003

Citations

113 S.W.3d 685 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)