From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 1, 1998
975 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 73162.

OPINION FILED: September 1, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONROE COUNTY, HONORABLE CARROLL M. BLACKWELL, JUDGE.

Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kevin F. Hennessey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.


ORDER


Todger Jones (Movant) appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. On appeal, Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his counsel was constitutionally ineffective by failing to object to the charging information as fatally defective.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 1, 1998
975 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:TODGER JAY JONES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Sep 1, 1998

Citations

975 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)