From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 6, 2003
848 So. 2d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 5D03-1288.

Opinion filed June 6, 2003. Rehearing Denied July 3, 2003.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Warren Burk, Judge.

Quincy Bernard Jones, Century, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Quincy Bernard Jones seeks review of an order denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In this proceeding, Jones asserts that his sentence exceeds the sentence stated in the plea agreement. We affirm.

This motion is successive. In a prior rule 3.800(a) motion, Jones raised the very same issue that is the subject of this appeal. Based on the supreme court's recent decision in McBride v. State, No. 02-627 (Fla. May 15, 2003), his claim is barred under the collateral estoppel doctrine. Thus, he is precluded from arguing in a successive 3.800 motion the same issue argued in the prior motion.

We caution Jones against filing additional successive and improper motions. Enough is enough. See Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also Thomas v. State, 824 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J. and PLEUS, J., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 6, 2003
848 So. 2d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:QUINCY BERNARD JONES, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 6, 2003

Citations

848 So. 2d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Jones v. State

8/7/02) (belated appeal); Jones v. State, Case No. 5D02-2607, aff'd, 829 So.2d 234 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…