Opinion
Case No. SC03-1474.
June 2, 2004.
Lower Tribunal No. 1D03-1159.
The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied on the merits. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (noting that to be entitled to the extraordinary writ of mandamus, the petitioner must have a clear legal right to the requested relief, the respondent must have an indisputable legal duty to perform the requested action, and the petitioner must have no other adequate remedy available).
WELLS, LEWIS, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., would request a response.