From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 10, 1993
617 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

Nos. 91-612, 92-455.

April 9, 1993. Rehearing Denied May 10, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Brevard County, John Dean Moxley, Jr., J.

Thomas H. Yardley and Maureen M. Matheson of Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell Wattwood, P.A., Melbourne, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The defendant appeals sentences he received for crimes committed in 1982 and 1986.

In the 1982 case, the defendant was sentenced to 12 years probation but appealed because he was unrepresented at the sentencing hearing. The trial court then resentenced the defendant, this time to 15 years probation. On appeal, the defendant contends that, because this sentence exceeded his prior sentence, it is presumptively vindictive pursuant to North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969). We disagree.

In Wood v. State, 582 So.2d 751 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), this court recognized that the presumption recognized in Pearce arises only where there is a reasonable likelihood of vindictiveness on the trial court's part. "Absent proof of an improper motive — or some sound reason to suspect the existence of one — no reasonable apprehension of vindictiveness can flourish." Wood at 581-82 (quoting United States v. Pimienta-Redondo, 874 F.2d 9, 12-14 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 890, 110 S.Ct. 233, 107 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989)). Because we find no evidence of vindictiveness whatsoever, we hold that the sentence is valid. We do, however, recognize that the defendant is entitled to credit for the approximately three years he has already spent on probation. See Ogden v. State, 605 So.2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Kolovrat v. State, 574 So.2d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Therefore, we reverse and remand for correction of defendant's sentence to reflect this credit.

We find the defendant's second point on appeal regarding the 1986 case to be without merit and therefore affirm the defendant's sentence in that case.

REVERSED and REMANDED in part; AFFIRMED in part.

COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 10, 1993
617 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY JAY JONES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 10, 1993

Citations

617 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Hennessey v. State

ve credit for the six months previously spent, we remand to the trial court for reconsideration of sentence.…