From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 12, 2007
212 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-7042.

Submitted: December 18, 2006.

Decided: January 12, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03012-D)

Maurice Wayne Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Maurice Wayne Jones appeals the district court's order dismissing hisBivens complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-ct-03012-D (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Jones v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 12, 2007
212 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Jones v. Stansberry

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE WAYNE JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 12, 2007

Citations

212 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2007)