Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Jones v. Southern Healthcare Agency

930 So. 2d 1270 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Jones v. Southern Healthcare Agency

3 Citing cases

  1. Price v. Omnova Solutions

    17 So. 3d 104 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 2 times

    ¶ 7. The Commission is the finder of fact, and this Court will defer to the findings of the Workers' Compensation Commission when those findings are supported by substantial evidence. Jones v. S. Healthcare Agency, 930 So.2d 1270, 1272 (¶ 10) (Miss.Ct.App. 2006). "We will only reverse the Commission's rulings where findings of fact are unsupported by substantial evidence, matters of law are clearly erroneous, or the decision was arbitrary and capricious."

  2. Bouldin v. Miss. Dept. of Health

    1 So. 3d 890 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 4 times
    In Bouldin, this Court held that even an injury sustained while an employee was returning to work from her lunch break was not compensable.

    ¶ 7. The Commission is the finder of fact, and this Court will defer to the findings of the Workers' Compensation Commission when those findings are supported by substantial evidence. Jones v. S. Healthcare Agency, 930 So.2d 1270, 1272 (¶ 10) (Miss.Ct.App. 2006). "We will only reverse the Commission's rulings where findings of fact are unsupported by substantial evidence, matters of law are clearly erroneous, or the decision was arbitrary and capricious."

  3. Garcia v. Super

    975 So. 2d 267 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 5 times

    ¶ 7. This Court will defer to the findings of the Workers' Compensation Commission when those findings are supported by substantial evidence. Jones v. S. Healthcare Agency, 930 So.2d 1270, 1272 (¶ 10) (Miss.Ct.App. 2006). "We will only reverse the Commission's rulings where findings of fact are unsupported by substantial evidence, matters of law are clearly erroneous, or the decision was arbitrary and capricious."