From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 25, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-0880-N-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-0880-N-BH

09-25-2020

ANGELA M. JONES, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED on this 25th day of September, 2020.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 25, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-0880-N-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2020)
Case details for

Jones v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA M. JONES, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 25, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-0880-N-BH (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2020)

Citing Cases

Bredeson v. Saul

However, “[t]he ALJ is not required to expressly discuss each finding by an SAMC or discuss each factor…