Opinion
No. 18-99005
07-10-2024
Danny Lee JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee.
Amanda Bass (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defenders Office, Phoenix, Arizona; Leticia Marquez, Assistant Federal Public Defender; Jon M. Sands, Federal Public Defender, District of Arizona; Federal Public Defender's Office, Tucson, Arizona; Jean-Claude Andre, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Santa Monica, California; Barbara A. Smith and J. Bennett Clark, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, St. Louis, Missouri; Kristin H. Corradini, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Chicago, Illinois; for Petitioner-Appellant. Jeffrey L. Sparks (argued), Deputy Solicitor General, Chief of Capital Litigation Section; Lacey S. Gard, Chief Counsel; Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General; Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Phoenix, Arizona; for Respondent-Appellee.
On Remand from United States Supreme Court, D.C. No. 2:01-cv-00384-SRB Amanda Bass (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defenders Office, Phoenix, Arizona; Leticia Marquez, Assistant Federal Public Defender; Jon M. Sands, Federal Public Defender, District of Arizona; Federal Public Defender's Office, Tucson, Arizona; Jean-Claude Andre, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Santa Monica, California; Barbara A. Smith and J. Bennett Clark, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, St. Louis, Missouri; Kristin H. Corradini, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Chicago, Illinois; for Petitioner-Appellant. Jeffrey L. Sparks (argued), Deputy Solicitor General, Chief of Capital Litigation Section; Lacey S. Gard, Chief Counsel; Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General; Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Phoenix, Arizona; for Respondent-Appellee. Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Sidney R. Thomas, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court remanded this appeal for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion. Thornell v. Jones, 602 U.S. —, 144 S.Ct. 1302, 1314, — L.Ed.2d — (2024). Pursuant to the Supreme Court's opinion, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.