From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Runge

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
21-00281 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

21-00281 BLF (PR)

09-07-2021

RONALD ANTHONY JONES, Plaintiff, v. KYLE RUNGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the officers at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). Dkt. No. 1. On May 11, 2021, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, to correct various deficiencies. Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed and advised that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of the action without further notice to Plaintiff. Id. at 5. Then on June 14, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff's request for an extension of time until July 30, 2021. Dkt. No. 12.

The deadline has long since passed, and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint in the time provided. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to file an amended complaint. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Runge

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
21-00281 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Runge

Case Details

Full title:RONALD ANTHONY JONES, Plaintiff, v. KYLE RUNGE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

21-00281 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)