From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Rojas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 5, 2021
No. 2:18-cv-00815-YY (D. Or. Apr. 5, 2021)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-00815-YY

04-05-2021

CLARENCE EUGENE JONES, Plaintiff, v. M. ROJAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Youlee You issued a Findings and Recommendation on February 23, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation [181]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint [152] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 5, 2021.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jones v. Rojas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 5, 2021
No. 2:18-cv-00815-YY (D. Or. Apr. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Rojas

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE EUGENE JONES, Plaintiff, v. M. ROJAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 5, 2021

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-00815-YY (D. Or. Apr. 5, 2021)