Opinion
No. 20190330
05-07-2020
Kayla JONES, Plaintiff v. Mark RATH, Defendant and Appellant and State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest
Kayla Jones; no appearance. Mark Rath, Bismarck, ND, defendant and appellant.
Kayla Jones; no appearance.
Mark Rath, Bismarck, ND, defendant and appellant.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Mark Rath appeals from orders denying his "motion for contempt" and request to reconsider. On appeal, Mark Rath argues the district court abused its discretion by not holding Kayla Rath in contempt. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). Mark Rath also made a multitude of additional arguments, including that he was denied due process. We summarily affirm the additional issues Mark Rath has raised under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte