From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Prince

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 7, 2012
NO. 12-36-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 7, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 12-36-JJB-SCR

06-07-2012

KEITH JONES (#106850) v. HOWARD PRINCE, ET AL.


CIVIL ACTION


RULING

The court has carefully considered the complaint, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated May 14, 2012 (doc. no. 13). The plaintiff has filed an objection which merely restates his prior argument and has been duly considered.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment For Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies filed on behalf of defendant Warden Howard Prince is GRANTED and the claims against him are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and with prejudice to refiling the claims in forma pauperis status.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 7th day of June, 2012.

__________________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Jones v. Prince

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 7, 2012
NO. 12-36-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Jones v. Prince

Case Details

Full title:KEITH JONES (#106850) v. HOWARD PRINCE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

NO. 12-36-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 7, 2012)