From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Pitkins

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 14, 2011
NO. 11-0927 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-0927.

October 14, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 14) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED with prejudice;
4. The motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED;
5. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and
6. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Pitkins

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 14, 2011
NO. 11-0927 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Jones v. Pitkins

Case Details

Full title:ROMONT A. JONES, Petitioner v. DAVID W. PITKINS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

NO. 11-0927 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2011)