Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-293 (MTT).
October 20, 2011
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of the Order. (Doc. 47). On September 29, 2011, the Court adopted United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle's Recommendation stating that the Plaintiff:
The Plaintiff claims he twice moved to extend the time to object, but neither motion is in the record. Nonetheless, considering the Objection as timely filed does not change the conclusions in the Order.
• Is not entitled to injunctive relief pursuant to the October 20, 2010, order.
• Can receive damages on his excessive force claims.
• Cannot receive compensatory or punitive damages on his free exercise of religion claims
• Can receive nominal damages on his free exercise of religion claims.