Jones v. Parker

Holley v. Shepard
1987 OK 92 (Okla. 1987) Cited 10 times
Holding that Court of Appeals, by redetermining credibility of witnesses and assuming facts not supported by the evidence had so far departed from the proper standard of review as to call for the exercise of the Supreme Court's supervisory power on certiorari
The effect and weight to be given conflicting or inconsistent testimony are questions of fact to be determined by the jury and not to be retried by the appellate courts where there is evidence to support the jury's determination.Frierson v. Hines, 426 P.2d 362 (Okla. 1967); Jones v. Parker, 380 P.2d 73 (Okla. 1963).Central Plastics Co. v. Goodson, 537 P.2d 330 (Okla. 1975).
Tucker v. Colorado Indoor Trap Shoot, Inc.
1970 OK 124 (Okla. 1970) Cited 7 times
"It is only where errors complained of have resulted in a miscarriage of justice, or constitute a substantial violation of some constitutional or statutory right, that this court will reverse a cause, because of the admission or rejection of evidence, the giving or refusing of instructions, or alleged errors in matters of pleading or procedure." Jones v. Parker, Okla., 380 P.2d 73; Bedwell v. Williams, Okla., 330 P.2d 359. The alleged errors complained of under defendants' Propositions I, IV and VI do not meet the above described test of reversible error.