From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Paramore

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 3, 2023
2:23-cv-01223-JHC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01223-JHC

10-03-2023

CORTEZ DAUNDRE JONES, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN BRYAN PARAMORE, Defendant.


ORDER TO TERMINATE MATTER

John H. Chun, United States District Judge

Before the Court is non-represented Plaintiff Cortez Daundre Jones's complaint against Defendant Kevin Bryan Paramore (Dkt. # 1-1) and accompanying application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. # 1. On August 16, 2023, Magistrate Judge Tsuchida recommended the immediate denial of Plaintiff's IFP application. Dkt. # 4. On August 18, 2023, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and ordered Plaintiff to pay the corresponding filing fee within thirty (30) days of its order. See LCR 3(a); Dkt. # 6. The Court clarified that if Plaintiff failed to do so, the matter would be dismissed. Dkt. # 6. Because thirty (30) days have passed since the court's order (Dkt. # 6), the Clerk is directed to close and terminate this matter.


Summaries of

Jones v. Paramore

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 3, 2023
2:23-cv-01223-JHC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Jones v. Paramore

Case Details

Full title:CORTEZ DAUNDRE JONES, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN BRYAN PARAMORE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Oct 3, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01223-JHC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 3, 2023)