From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Original Time Capsule LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2022
22-CV-07018 (PGG) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-07018 (PGG) (BCM)

12-01-2022

DAMON JONES, Plaintiff, v. ORIGINAL TIME CAPSULE LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

BARBARA MOSES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Damon Jones filed his Complaint on August 17, 2022, (Dkt. 1), and served defendant Original Time Capsule LLC on October 15, 2022, making defendant's answer due November 7, 2022. (Dkt. 7.) Defendant's counsel appeared on October 26, 2022. (Dkt. 8.) On November 28, 2022, I ordered plaintiff to either grant defendant additional time to answer or apply for an entry of default if defendant did not file its answer to the Complaint by December 5, 2022. (Dkt. 9.) On November 30, 2022, defendant filed a Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement signed by defendant's counsel (Dkt. 10), and an unsigned Answer. (Dkt. 11.) Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a) requires every pleading to be signed by at least one attorney of record.

It is hereby ORDERED that defendant shall file a signed Answer no later than December 5, 2022.

It is further ORDERED that an initial conference in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 will be held on January 26, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. At the conference, the parties must be prepared to discuss the subjects set forth in Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and (c).

It is further ORDERED that counsel shall meet and confer in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) no later than 21 days prior to the initial case management conference. No later than one week (seven calendar days) prior to the conference, the parties shall file a Pre-Conference Statement, via ECF, signed by counsel for all parties. The Statement, which will constitute the written report required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f)(2), shall contain the following information:

1. The date of the conference and appearances for the parties, including the names of the individual attorneys who will attend, their law firms, addresses, and telephone numbers, and the party or parties represented. The Court expects each party's principal trial attorney to attend the conference.

2. A concise statement of the nature of the case and the issues as they appear on the date of the Statement, including any issues as to jurisdiction or venue and any anticipated motions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) or (c).

3. A proposed deadline for joining additional parties, amending the pleadings, or moving for leave to do so.

4. A proposed discovery schedule including:

a. A date for exchanging the automatic disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), or the date on which such disclosures were accomplished;
b. Dates for the service of initial document production requests and interrogatories (limited in accordance with Local Civil Rule 33.3);
c. A date by which all fact depositions will be completed, including the names (if known) or descriptions of persons expected to be deposed;
d. A date for the close of all fact discovery;
e. Dates by which each party's expert report(s) or other expert disclosure, and any responding reports, will be supplied to the adversary;
f. A date for the close of all discovery, including expert depositions.

5. Any proposed limitations to be placed on discovery, including protective or confidentiality orders. The parties may (but are not required to) use the Model Protective Order found on the Court's website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-barbara-moses.

6. Any anticipated discovery issues that may warrant early attention from the Court (including ESI protocols, litigation holds, and other issues relating to the preservation, retrieval and/or production of electronically stored information).

7. A date, approximately 30 days prior to the close of fact discovery, for a status conference with the Court.

8. When the case should be (a) referred to mediation or (b) scheduled for a settlement conference with the Court.

9. A date for the filing of pre-motion conference requests regarding summary judgment.

10. The anticipated length of trial and whether a jury has been requested.

11. Whether the parties wish to consent to trial before the designated magistrate judge.

To the extent the parties are in disagreement concerning any portion of the Pre Conference Statement, they may submit separate proposals as to such portion, without argument.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Original Time Capsule LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2022
22-CV-07018 (PGG) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Jones v. Original Time Capsule LLC

Case Details

Full title:DAMON JONES, Plaintiff, v. ORIGINAL TIME CAPSULE LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 1, 2022

Citations

22-CV-07018 (PGG) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022)