From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Odom

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 28, 2020
No. 20-6486 (4th Cir. Jul. 28, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6486

07-28-2020

CLAYTON T. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER CHRIS E. ODOM, Defendant - Appellee.

Clayton T. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (3:19-cv-03326-TMC) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clayton T. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clayton T. Jones appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Jones' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2018). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Odom, No. 3:19-cv-03326-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Jones v. Odom

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 28, 2020
No. 20-6486 (4th Cir. Jul. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Jones v. Odom

Case Details

Full title:CLAYTON T. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER CHRIS E. ODOM…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 28, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6486 (4th Cir. Jul. 28, 2020)