From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Noga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 26, 2020
No. 4:19-cv-3315-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Jun. 26, 2020)

Opinion

No. 4:19-cv-3315-SNLJ

06-26-2020

KAREN TATUM JONES, Plaintiff, v. CARIANNE LARISSA NOGA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon review of the file. For the reasons explained below, this case will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff initiated this case on December 20, 2019, and filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court granted the motion and reviewed the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and determined that it was subject to dismissal. On April 23, 2020, the Court entered an order directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint to cure the defects. In the order, the Court clearly explained why the complaint was subject to dismissal, gave plaintiff clear instructions about how to prepare the amended complaint, and cautioned her that her failure to timely comply with the order would result in the dismissal of her case without further notice.

Plaintiff's response was due to the Court on May 26, 2020. To date, however, she has neither responded to the Court's order, nor sought additional time to do so. The Court gave plaintiff meaningful notice of what was expected, cautioned her that her case would be dismissed if she failed to timely comply, and gave her significant additional time to comply. Therefore, this action will be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's April 23, 2020 order and her failure to prosecute her case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (a district court has the power to dismiss an action for the plaintiff's failure to comply with any court order); Dudley v. Miles, 597 F. App'x 392 (8th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal without prejudice where pro se plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint despite being cautioned that dismissal could result from failure to do so).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED than an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.

Dated this 26th day of June, 2020.

/s/_________

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Noga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 26, 2020
No. 4:19-cv-3315-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Jun. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Jones v. Noga

Case Details

Full title:KAREN TATUM JONES, Plaintiff, v. CARIANNE LARISSA NOGA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 26, 2020

Citations

No. 4:19-cv-3315-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Jun. 26, 2020)